FAO: Fraud may account for up to 20% of global seafood trade

The report titled “Food fraud in the fisheries and aquaculture sector” analyzes common types of fraud and how they occur throughout the supply chain. According to the report, the seafood sector is increasingly vulnerable to fraud due to the fact that more than 12,000 species are traded and multiple regulatory authorities are involved across different countries. These factors create loopholes for misconduct.

The main drivers of fraud are economic, including species substitution (selling low-value fish as high-value species), mislabeling, falsifying sustainability certifications, misreporting origin or farming methods, and adulteration to increase weight or improve product appearance. For example, farmed sea bass labeled as “locally caught” in Italy can be sold at prices two to three times higher than imported products from Greece or Turkey.

 

Beyond economic losses, such practices may also conceal illegal or over-quota fishing activities, thereby threatening the sustainability of aquatic resources. The report estimates the probability of fraud in this sector at 20.6%, significantly higher than in meat (13.4%) and fruits and vegetables (10.4%).

Evidence from previous studies shows that fraud is widespread. A global survey by the nonprofit organization Oceana found that one in five seafood samples was mislabeled. In the European Union, about one-third of large-scale food service providers violated labeling regulations, while in China, fraud rates may reach as high as 75.5%.

FAO emphasizes that addressing the issue requires more than increased inspections; it calls for a smarter approach. Key measures include risk-based controls, improved traceability systems, stronger international cooperation, and the implementation of sufficiently strict sanctions to deter violations.

Although modern technologies such as DNA testing and isotope analysis can improve fraud detection, their high costs and technical complexity may widen gaps between countries. Therefore, FAO recommends enhancing regional cooperation, sharing laboratory capacities, and building sustainable management systems rather than relying on isolated pilot projects.

One important recommendation is to harmonize global labeling regulations, including the use of scientific species names. However, achieving consensus remains challenging due to differences in language, culture, and commercial interests among countries.

Source: VASEP

WE WORK FOR THE SUCCESS

• Direct: "Don't wait for the pipe to leak to check the valve: 4 signs to watch out for

• Can Tho invests 10B VND in aquaculture water quality monitoring

• Wild Shrimp: Supply Depletion and the Sustainability Challenge

• PVC Knife Gate Valve Leaking Water and Not Closing Tightly: Causes and Detailed Solutions

• 5 common mistakes when choosing knife valves for piping systems

• What makes the Aqua Mina PVC knife valve different? 5 key advantages

• Where are PVC knife gate valves used in aquaculture water supply and drainage systems?

• 2026 Shrimp Farm Design Trends: From Traditional Ponds to Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

• Shrimp Farming Financial Management: How to Ensure Your Harvest Is Profitable?

• How Much Does a PVC Knife Gate Valve Cost? Factors Determining Valve Prices

• Where to Buy Reliable PVC Knife Gate Valves? 6 Criteria for Choosing a Supplier

• PVC Ball Valve Ø140, Ø160, Ø168: Which size should you choose?