FAO: Fraud may account for up to 20% of global seafood trade

The report titled “Food fraud in the fisheries and aquaculture sector” analyzes common types of fraud and how they occur throughout the supply chain. According to the report, the seafood sector is increasingly vulnerable to fraud due to the fact that more than 12,000 species are traded and multiple regulatory authorities are involved across different countries. These factors create loopholes for misconduct.

The main drivers of fraud are economic, including species substitution (selling low-value fish as high-value species), mislabeling, falsifying sustainability certifications, misreporting origin or farming methods, and adulteration to increase weight or improve product appearance. For example, farmed sea bass labeled as “locally caught” in Italy can be sold at prices two to three times higher than imported products from Greece or Turkey.

 

Beyond economic losses, such practices may also conceal illegal or over-quota fishing activities, thereby threatening the sustainability of aquatic resources. The report estimates the probability of fraud in this sector at 20.6%, significantly higher than in meat (13.4%) and fruits and vegetables (10.4%).

Evidence from previous studies shows that fraud is widespread. A global survey by the nonprofit organization Oceana found that one in five seafood samples was mislabeled. In the European Union, about one-third of large-scale food service providers violated labeling regulations, while in China, fraud rates may reach as high as 75.5%.

FAO emphasizes that addressing the issue requires more than increased inspections; it calls for a smarter approach. Key measures include risk-based controls, improved traceability systems, stronger international cooperation, and the implementation of sufficiently strict sanctions to deter violations.

Although modern technologies such as DNA testing and isotope analysis can improve fraud detection, their high costs and technical complexity may widen gaps between countries. Therefore, FAO recommends enhancing regional cooperation, sharing laboratory capacities, and building sustainable management systems rather than relying on isolated pilot projects.

One important recommendation is to harmonize global labeling regulations, including the use of scientific species names. However, achieving consensus remains challenging due to differences in language, culture, and commercial interests among countries.

Source: VASEP

WE WORK FOR THE SUCCESS

• Sharing the benefits of shrimp farming between ponds

• Ca Mau Prepares to Launch a 5.3 Trillion VND High-Tech Aquaculture Project

• AQUA MINA Welcomes International Delegation: Expanding Opportunities for Cooperation in the Aquaculture Industry

• Secrets to Maintaining Optimal Water Color in Intensive Vannamei Shrimp Ponds During Hot Weather

• Comparing Handheld vs. 24/7 Fixed Oxygen Meters for Aquaculture: Which Option Suits Your Pond Best?

• AQUA MINA Oxygen Meter and Warning System for Shrimp and Fish: A Reliable Helper for Aquaculture Pond Monitoring

• Portable Dissolved Oxygen, pH, and Temperature Meter: 3 Essential Parameters Integrated into One Device

• AQUA MINA at the Japan Seafood Expo 2026: Vietnamese Equipment Makes Its Mark on the International Stage

• Innovating Sturgeon Farming Models to Unlock New Economic Development Opportunities in Nậm Chày

• Enhancing Adaptability Towards a Sustainable Shrimp Industry

• VASEP and ABRAPES join forces to boost seafood trade between Vietnam and Brazil

• How strictly is the chlorine gas management process controlled?